
It says a lot about his fame that John McCririck’s demotion to part-time betting pundit on Channel 4 Racing has caused a bit of ripple in the British media, with many expressing surprise at his demotion to a part-timer.
I don’t know the guy, and from what I hear from people who’ve previosuly worked with him, he’s a nasty man. However, the vast majority of racing fans admire him not just for his arm-waving and eccentric manner, but for his passion for the sport, and for speaking up on behalf of punters in matters ranging from betting to the rules of the turf.
Channel 4’s head of sport, Andrew Thompson was said to have been behind the decision to partially banish McCririck from our screens - not the racing editor at the production company, Highflyer. This extraordinary interference was apparently based on the belief that McCririck now has too high a profile and is overshadowing the sport and fellow presenters.
That doesn’t wash with Bleungberg: McCririck’s input in the programme is, whilst essential, limited. Much of the time is devoted to the racing itself or the pre-parade, so by saying McCririck’s presence on screen detracts from the product itself or his colleagues simply do not wash.
Besides, there’s a bad smell of hypocrisy in Thompson’s statement that McCririck’s fame is a contributory factor in his downfall: isn’t Channel 4 primarily responsible for building his fame, not just through Channel 4 Racing, but also via Celebrity Big Brother, the Paul O’Grady Show and The Priory? An intriguing subplot is that Thompson is married to Alison Sharman, head of daytime TV over at ITV, and doesn’t take kindly to McCririck’s chauvinistic opinions. Could she have had a say in Big Mac’s demotion? After all, it’s only been a month or so since Big Mac was asked to leave the stage during a rant on the Alan Titchmarch Show on, you’ve guessed it, ITV, broadcast at 3pm, and overseen by….Mrs Thompson!
Whatever the reasons behind the demotion, this is somebody who’s just had an outstanding Cheltenham Festival, knows the game inside out, has true journalistic integrity and, in all honesty, doesn’t deserve this kind of treatment so close to retirement. You either retire/sack him completely, or you keep the status quo. McCririck has not held back in his criticisms for his boss, and I just wonder if that’s made his position untenable, and could in fact, give Thompson the perfect excuse to get rid of him completely.