
For the first time in Bleungberg’s life, the men’s singles final at Wimbledon became an unbearable - and often - unwatchable affair. Everyone said the 2007 final between Federer and Nadal was a memorable one though it was fairly forgettable in my opinion.
The 2008 renewal, however, was gripping from start to finish as so much was at stake for both players: Federer to win six on a trot, and Nadal to make it a unique Roland Garros-Queen’s-Wimbledon triple-crown.
Finals have a habit of being something of a damp squib and after a shockingly good fortnight of Grand Slam tennis, a terrible final would have been a horrible anti-climax.
Having sat through some pretty dull finals down the years - the Hewiit-Nalbadian match in 2002 springs to mind - it looked a distinct possibility with Nadal racing through the opening two-and-a-quarter sets before the rain came to the rescue of Federer, followed by a late resurgence before an unforgettable conclusion at 9.15pm in near darkness.
Great finals stick in my mind - the 2000 and 2001 versions were pretty damn good - but nothing compared to 2008’s 4h48m epic.
Federer will now have to regroup and re-focus his energy on his two remaining targets this summer: the Olympics and the US Open. He had told his critics who had predicted his demise to back off until after the summer, and frankly, so much will be riding on Flushing Meadows now.
Nadal has a habit of underperforming in the second half of the season - in fact, it tails right off the moment Wimbledon finishes as his fragile kneecaps succumb to the hard court season in the US and Canada.
We sincerely hope that he will be fit and ready for the challenge as he will now be gunning for his third consecutive Grand Slam. Federer will be gunning for his fifth title in New York, and still chasing Pete Sampras’s all-time record of 14 Slam victories to the Swiss’s 12. The number 1 status is at stake, as is Federer’s future in tennis (perhaps). So much will be riding on the final come Sunday night on the 7th September.
The next year will be very interesting for those of us who follow this wonderful sport. Will Federer win any of the Slams in the next year? If and when he loses his number 1 ranking, the pressure will be off him at Wimbledon, and on Nadal at both Wimbledon and Roland Garros. Federer could well still be in hunt for Sampras’s record but definitely not as intense as now. It could well be wise for Federer to concentrate solely on Roland Garros next year, and claim to become the fifth men ever to have won on all four surfaces.
A few final thoughts:
1) Much has been said about both men breaking or equalling Bjorn Borg’s record this year. Bleungberg was three months old when Borg won his fifth title in 1980. And it’s taken 28 years for two men to come along to equal what ONE man had achieved. Borg’s record is simply awesome.
2) Spain -how does this country produce so many magnificent champions in so many sports? Football, formula one, cycling and, of course, tennis - long before Nadal was even born.
3) The BBC is putting celebrity ahead of quality by pairing Andrew Castle and Tim Henman up for this year’s final. Henman - whiny, nasaly and bland - is no match for Boris Becker or Jimmy Connors. Meanwhile, Castle is not as authoritative as his many more-experienced colleagues and should not have been behind the mic for the final.
