
Jackie Chan, also known by his stage name ‘Victorious Dragon’, has at last shown his true colours as a bona-fide Chinese communist sympathiser by denouncing Taiwan and Hong Kong’s population as ‘uncontrollable’, and suggested that they would be better off in a PRC-style government.
Having previously been criticised after calling Taiwan’s recent election results ‘a joke’ - and let’s not forget his rather cringe worthy kowtowing to the Communist Politburo during the Beijing Olympics as one of its torch-bearers, this latest incident - filmed in front of a live studio audience - demonstrates to the wider world what we have always known: that he’s a talentless twit and poodle to the PRC.
“I’m gradually beginning to feel that we Chinese need to be controlled.” Chan opined before an audience of business suits in southern China.
He added that freedom currently enjoyed in Hong Kong and Taiwan made these societies “chaotic”.
Oops.
His PR said these comments had been taken out of context, and that he was merely describing the entertainment industry as ‘uncontrollable’ and ‘chaotic’.
Some back-paddling!
Presumably his PR(C) troopS are also the ones to have deleted/limited coverage of his remarks on Chan’s Chinese wikipedia pages - the controversy appears in the Mandarin version of the his profile but with no mention of the reaction in Taiwan and Hong Kong, whilst there’s the entire controversy is overlooked on the Cantonese version.
If there is one word that Hong Kongese and Taiwanese are very touchy about when it comes to the PRC, it’s ‘freedom’. Forget prosperity, water and food supply, energy or electricity, Hong Kong and Taiwan’s residents know they have to live side-by-side with China for these essential resources, and thus turn a blind eye to whatever the Wen and Hu are unleashing on their own 1 billion-plus people.
Deep down, however, they worry about China’s looming shadow and know that the freedom they currently enjoy may not last forever. So, the fact that ‘Victorious Dragon’ would even dare to raise the subject and to implicitly suggest that freedom is a bad thing for the locals means that not only is he completely out of touch and deluded, he’s also an out-and-proud communist and PRC cheerleader.
It’s just fantastic that Chan has been roundly condemned by the media on both sides of the Taiwanese Strait and that calls for boycotts of his films are gathering momentum.
For years, he was untouchable as no one dared to criticise someone who had broken through the linguistic (and racial) barriers to achieve international fame and glory by acting like an idiot in Hollywood films. (Think ‘Shanghai Knights’ with Owen Wilson)
But now the backlash is in full swing, so maybe we can start telling him that he hasn’t actually made a decent movie since ‘Police Story’ in 1985? Or that his English is terrible and an embarrassment to the Chinese community? And what about his god-awful singing with that terrible voice?!